The story, "Jergen Kohaut's Blues," begins
with a break-up. That's typical for blues, of course—"Since my baby left me."
This story, however, broke some new ground for me. First off, it was a long story,
finishing at a little over 27,000 words—a novelette, I guess. These days, longer
stories are more difficult to market. The combination
of short attention spans and employment of sound-bite theory to everything from
news reporting to politics has reinforced this tendency toward shortness. One
of the things it has spawned is flash fiction.
I don't write flash fiction and I don't like it
either. Just as an experiment and to see if I could do it, I've written and
published a couple of flash stories, stories under 1000 words. Now, though, I
see calls for stories under 500 words and even under 100 words. And I see word
count restrictions creeping downward.
It seems impossible to me to write a story in that
short a space. Stories are made up of plot, character, narrative, setting,
symbol and theme (the formalist set of elements). I don't see how one could
construct a plot, engage in character development, describe a setting so it
creates a proper psychological environment, develop incisive narration, possibly
include symbolism, and develop a theme using so few words. There is a technique
to it, and I can see the challenge there. But it seems to me that such writing
is more a verbal construct than a story.
Verbal
construct is a term I have come up with for a lot of what I
see now, especially in journals that print literary fiction. The old notion of
a story with a beginning, middle and end; a plot that has conflict, rising
action, climax, falling action, and denouement has been replaced in part with
the idea that a work of literature is a creation using language—a sharp,
brilliant creation that startles us and perhaps gets our attention but is not a
story in the traditional sense.
In The Paris
Review a while back I came across a story called "Imperatives."
The whole thing consisted of imperative sentences: "Keep off the grass. Do what I say. Obey
the rules and don't drive over 55. Use the rear door for deliveries." This
went on for ten pages! There was no story, only a collection of sentences in
the imperative mood, the mood of command. I marveled that someone could write
something like this, coming up with so many imperative sentences; so did the
editor of The Paris Review, I guess,
because he or she published it. But it was not a story, really, it was a verbal
construct. Many of the things I encounter in journals are like this, though
they are not often as extreme as "Imperatives." But they usually
focus on a character with an obsession, a quirk, impulsive tendencies, or some weirdness.
Nothing much happens in the story. They are well-written and the language
dazzles. But the elements of story, listed above, are absent.
"Jergen Kohaut's Blues," is long, which means
it has the time to develop the elements of a story. The plot unfolds with a
conflict and then complications. Jergen's relationship with his live-in
girlfriend is on the rocks. Hannah is using drugs, thinking he doesn't know.
She has become clingy and obnoxious. Jergen loves her and they have been
thinking about marriage, but her behavior is complicating things.
In the midst
of this, Jergen has a chance to back up Sossity
Chander, whose marriage has
broken up, and who is on the make to psychologically retaliate against her
unfaithful husband. She and Jergen end up having a short affair. Hannah's
behavior enables Jergen to justify his affair and the two of them split. He
becomes Sossity's boyfriend, though, he soon finds out, boy-toy would be the
more accurate description. Still, there are perks. She pays him for backing her
up. He stands in with her band a couple of times and ends up playing for her,
first as a back-up musician, then as a full-fledged member. As time goes along,
he starts to realize that his relationship with Sossity will not last and
begins to remember Hannah. A chance meeting with her, however, convinces him
that their relationship cannot be salvaged.
This is the plot of "Jergen Kohaut's
Blues." The conflict is between Jergen and Hannah, but also between
Jergen's love for her and his ambition to be a rock star. When Sossity Chandler
hires him, the door to success opens, but he must do it without Hannah, whom he
really loves. He must turn his back on her in order to achieve success as a
musician. He also soon realizes that Sossity's love will be short-lived and
that she is only interested in him because she is angry at her ex-husband and
is having affairs because of this. He will eventually be dropped. Still, he
wants to make it big in the musical world so he allows himself to play the role
of willing lover.
You could never develop a plot like this in 1000,
500, or 100 words. The difference would be between a painting and an artist's preliminary
sketches—the difference between a full-length drama and a two-minute skit.
I admire people who can write flash. And a lot of
people seem to enjoy it. Still, it is sui generis,
one
of a kind, unique, a thing unto itself. Flash fiction is not a story in the
traditional sense of the word. There is plenty of room in the literary world
for variety. My concern, however, is that the tendency flash fiction represents—the
tendency toward brevity—will restrict stories that take time and
space to
develop.
More on "Jergen Kohaut's Blues" in my next
blog.
If you like reading about blues, you'll love my novella, Strange Brew.
A new anthology, Arthur: King of Ages, about the many incarnations of Arthur, features my story, "Arturia," which takes place in the future, Arthur is female and leading an alliance of twelve planets against a powerful intergalactic army. If you like high fantasy with a twist, this text is for you.
For more titles, check out my Writer's Page.
Comments welcome!
No comments:
Post a Comment